Tutuklu gazeteci-yazar Ahmet Altan hakk\u0131nda, 27 Haziran 2016 tarihinde haberdar.com adl\u0131 haber sitesinde\u00a0yay\u0131mlanan \u201cEzip Ge\u00e7mek\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 nedeniyle \u201cCumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na hakaret\u201d ve \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131\u201d su\u00e7lamalar\u0131yla dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten \u0130stanbul 26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, davan\u0131n 28 \u015eubat 2018 g\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclen karar duru\u015fmas\u0131nda Altan\u2019a \u201c\u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131\u201d su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131l, \u201cCumhurba\u015fkan\u0131na hakaret\u201d su\u00e7undan ise 2 y\u0131l 11 ay olmak \u00fczere toplam 5 y\u0131l 11 ay hapis cezas\u0131 vermi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
Altan\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan istinafa ta\u015f\u0131nan dosyay\u0131 inceleyen \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Ceza Dairesi, 17 Aral\u0131k 2019 tarihinde Altan\u2019a verilen cezay\u0131 onad\u0131.\u00a0\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Ceza Dairesi, ilk derece mahkemesinin verdi\u011fi kararda us\u00fble ve esasa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerde ve i\u015flemlerde herhangi bir eksik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle Altan\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu esastan reddetti.<\/p>\n
\u201cAtat\u00fcrk\u2019e hakaret\u201d su\u00e7lamas\u0131ndan beraat<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00d6te yandan \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 18. Ceza Dairesi ise Altan hakk\u0131nda \u201cAtat\u00fcrk\u2019\u00fcn hat\u0131ras\u0131na alenen hakaret\u201d su\u00e7undan verilen 1 y\u0131l 6 ayl\u0131k hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rarak\u00a0beraatine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n \u0130stanbul Anadolu 2. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi, kapat\u0131lan\u00a0Taraf<\/em>\u00a0gazetesinde 4 Kas\u0131m 2010 tarihinde yay\u0131mlanan \u201cCHP\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n 2 Temmuz 2019 g\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclen duru\u015fmas\u0131nda Altan\u2019a \u201cAtat\u00fcrk\u2019e hakaret\u201d su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 vermi\u015fti. Altan\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu inceleyen\u00a0\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 18. Ceza Dairesi, Altan hakk\u0131nda verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve Altan\u2019\u0131n beraatine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 18. Ceza Dairesi 26 Aral\u0131k 2019 tarihli karar\u0131nda, hakaret su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n \u00dc\u00e7 y\u0131l iki ay s\u00fcren tutuklulu\u011funun ard\u0131ndan 4 Kas\u0131m 2019 tarihinde tahliye edilen Ahmet Altan, savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine \u0130stanbul 27. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131yla 13 Kas\u0131m 2019 g\u00fcn\u00fc yeniden tutukland\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n 31 Aral\u0131k 2019 tarihinde \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye\u00a0Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilmesinin ard\u0131ndan mahkemeye dilek\u00e7e g\u00f6nderen avukat Figen Albuga \u00c7al\u0131ku\u015fu, \u201ch\u00fck\u00fcm sonras\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r yasa ve hukuk ihlali ile\u201d tutuklanan Ahmet Altan\u2019\u0131n derhal tahliyesini talep etti. \u00c7al\u0131ku\u015fu, \u201cHukuku her g\u00fcn dilek\u00e7e vererek arayaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n \u201cHukuksal rezalete son verilsin\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n M\u00fcvekkili Altan\u2019\u0131n \u201chukuksal zorbal\u0131kla\u201d yeniden tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7eken \u00c7al\u0131ku\u015fu dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle, \u00fcst mahkeme olan \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye\u00a0Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve a\u011f\u0131r mevzuat ihlalini ortadan kald\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi: \u201cBu dilek\u00e7enin konusu T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de bir ilk olan \u2018mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne\u2019 yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde bir savc\u0131n\u0131n itiraz etmesi ve \u2018adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm ile tahliye edilen\u2019 Ahmet Altan\u2019\u0131n 8 g\u00fcn sonra anayasal ve yasal haklar\u0131 \u2018hi\u00e7 say\u0131larak\u2019 itiraz \u00fczerine ve su\u00e7 i\u015flemeyi g\u00f6ze alarak tutuklanmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu tutuklamay\u0131 yapabilmek ad\u0131na T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131 yok say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. CMK h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine uydurabilmek gibi nafile gayret ile yasa maddeleri \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131k i\u00e7inde \u00f6z\u00fcne, ruhuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak delik de\u015fik edilmi\u015ftir. \u00dcst derece mercii olan Dairenin, m\u00fcvekkilin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne hukuksal zorbal\u0131k ile el koyan bu a\u011f\u0131r hukuksuzlu\u011fu ve kasten mevzuat ihlalini t\u00fcm neticeleri ile ortadan kald\u0131rmak y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bulunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130lk derece mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 denetleme yetkisine sahip Dairenin bu hukuksal rezalete derhal son vermesi gerekir.\u201d<\/p>\n Dilek\u00e7esinde, ilk derece mahkemesinin h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc verdikten sonra dava dosyas\u0131ndan el \u00e7ekti\u011fini, yetkinin s\u0131ra ile istinaf ve Yarg\u0131tay mercilerinde oldu\u011funu hat\u0131rlatan \u00c7al\u0131ku\u015fu, bir ba\u015fka ilk derece mahkemesinin itiraz \u00fczerine h\u00fckme dokunma yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\nAltan\u2019\u0131n avukat\u0131 \u00c7al\u0131ku\u015fu: \u201cHukuku her g\u00fcn dilek\u00e7e vererek arayaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d<\/h1>\n